Why SBOM Matters: Beyond Penetration Testing and Source Code Review

In today’s software-driven world, the complexity of applications has grown exponentially. With this complexity comes an increased risk of vulnerabilities, especially when software components are sourced from third-party libraries, open-source repositories, or external vendors. To manage this risk effectively, organizations are turning to a powerful tool: the Software Bill of Materials (SBOM). 

But what exactly is an SBOM, and how does it compare to established practices like penetration testing and source code review? More importantly, what stages do these methods operate in, and how much of your application’s security do they cover? 

Let’s dive into the answers. 

Understanding SBOM: A Digital Inventory of Software Components 

An SBOM is a structured inventory of all components that make up a software product. It includes: 

• Component names and versions 
• Dependency relationships 
• Licensing information 
• Supplier details 
• Known vulnerabilities (when integrated with vulnerability databases) 

Think of it as the software equivalent of a nutrition label—providing transparency into what’s inside your application. 

When Do SBOM, Penetration Testing, and Source Code Review Operate? 

Each of these practices plays a distinct role at different stages of the software development lifecycle: 

This layered approach ensures that security is addressed from multiple angles—during development, at build time, and in production. 

Each method contributes uniquely to the security posture of an application: 

• Penetration Testing  simulates real-world attacks to validate the effectiveness of security controls. If you’d like to see how this works in practice, explore our penetration testing services that help identify runtime vulnerabilities before they impact your production environment.
• Source Code Review is proactive, catching issues early in the development phase. Check out our Source Code Review services to secure your code before release.
• SBOM provides visibility into what’s inside the software, especially third-party components, and continues to be relevant post-deployment. 

Security Coverage: How Much Does Each Method Cover? 

While exact percentages can differ in scope, depth and quality. Based on industry insights and expert consensus, here’s an approximate breakdown of their coverage in terms of application security.  

Note:  These percentages are not additive but complementary. Together, they form a robust, multi-layered security strategy

SBOM vs. Traditional Security Practices: A Complementary Approach 

Refer the table below, SBOMs don’t replace penetration testing or code reviews—they complement them by filling critical visibility gaps. 

How SBOMApp Can Help 

While this blog focuses on the general importance of SBOMs, tools like SBOMApp are designed to simplify and automate SBOM generation, integration, and analysis. Whether you’re a developer, security analyst, or compliance officer, SBOMApp helps you maintain visibility, traceability, and security across your software assets. 

Conclusion 

SBOMs are not a replacement for penetration testing or source code reviews—they are a critical addition to your security toolkit. By providing deep visibility into your software’s composition, SBOMs empower organizations to manage risk, ensure compliance, and build trust in their software products. 

As the software landscape continues to evolve, embracing SBOMs is not just smart—it’s essential. 

Learn more in our detailed guide on the critical importance of SBOM compliance